Thursday, October 13, 2011

2011 Proposed By-law changes have been posted

The Board would like residents to review the following by-law proposals:  link to file

Please provide any comments on them before the December 15th deadline.

3 comments:

  1. I think By Law amendments should only be approved by the membership. This is what is stated in Article XIX of our current By Laws.
    Sam A.Martin

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry my previous blog referred to Article V 1.2 and 2.1 should have been Article VI
    Article V - 2.0- 2 car and 2 boat stickers are unfair. Some people have more than 2 cars or 2 boats. The membership actually voted to allow members to purchase additional stickers a few years ago but this was not adhered to. We have 2 canoes and 2 boats and have never taken one fish out of the lake. Some people with only one boat take an abundance of fish out of the lake; so I don't understand why we have to limit stickers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I posted 2 blogs but only one appears so I will try again.
    Since grantee is defined in Article I, should the word grantee be used instead of membership.
    Article III- Do BOD have to physically attend meetings or can it be done by conference call? 9.0 Reasonable expenses should be defined not as BOD sees fit.
    Article VI - 1.2. BOD should not have the authority to adjust dues, it should only be done by the membership at a general meeting.2.1 - lesser amount should be defined as 25%
    Article VIII - why only 3 proxies
    Article XII - Votes on bi-law changes and/or amendments should only be taken at a General Meeting when most of the owners can attend.
    Previous Articles XV and XVI have been eliminated. Shouldn't only the parts which refer to the water company be eliminated?

    ReplyDelete